Skip to main content
Download PDF

Large-scale association study for structural soundness and leg locomotion traits in the pig

Genetics Selection Evolution volume 41, Article number: 14 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Identification and culling of replacement gilts with poor skeletal conformation and feet and leg (FL) unsoundness is an approach used to reduce sow culling and mortality rates in breeding stock. Few candidate genes related to soundness traits have been identified in the pig.

Methods

In this study, 2066 commercial females were scored for 17 traits describing body conformation and FL structure, and were used for association analyses. Genotyping of 121 SNPs derived from 95 genes was implemented using Sequenom's MassARRAY system.

Results

Based on the association results from single trait and principal components using mixed linear model analyses and false discovery rate testing, it was observed that APOE, BMP8, CALCR, COL1A2, COL9A1, DKFZ, FBN1 and VDBP were very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated with body conformation traits. The genes ALOX5, BMP8, CALCR, OPG, OXTR and WNT16 were very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated with FL structures, and APOE, CALCR, COL1A2, GNRHR, IHH, MTHFR and WNT16 were highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with overall leg action. Strong linkage disequilibrium between CALCR and COL1A2 on SSC9 was detected, and haplotype -ACGACC- was highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with overall leg action and several important FL soundness traits.

Conclusion

The present findings provide a comprehensive list of candidate genes for further use in fine mapping and biological functional analyses.

Background

The skeleton, defined as the mineralized or mineralizable tissues, forms the essential basis for body framework in higher vertebrates [1]. The skeletal system, including bone and cartilage, serves as supportive, protective and connective roles for other organs and tissues during the growth and development of individuals, and is involved in determining the body size, shape, physical fitness and leg movement. The developmental processes of skeletons are complicated and are regulated by genetic factors and their interactions with environmental factors [1, 2]. In humans, abnormal development of the skeleton can lead to or be predisposing to the incidence of a series of bone related disorders, such as dwarfism, osteochondrosis, osteoporosis, osteopetrosis and osteoarthritis, which affect the normal action capability and could result in lameness in severe cases.

Feet and leg unsoundness issues are of growing concern in the swine industry. Lameness caused by feet and leg (FL) problems and osteochondrosis are considered to be crucial causes for sow culling [3–5]. Previous culling rates have been estimated to range from 10 to 40% because of unsoundness issues in young breeding stock [3, 6]. According to PigCHAMP™ 2007 annual report, the average culling rate of breeding females have been 48.65%, and 20~25% of that was caused primarily by locomotion problems. http://www.pigchamp.com/summary_archives.html.

The evaluation of FL structure soundness can be implemented using objective and subjective methods. Radiograph, macroscopical joint lesion diagnosis and histological observation, bone length and diameter measurement on specific body locations are expensive and difficult methods for objective evaluation of FL soundness [3, 7–9]. The subjective approaches are usually performed by scoring the pastern posture, gait and movement conditions of leg and feet using a scale with numbers ranging between the extreme values [10–13]. Although objective evaluation measures may be more direct and accurate for FL soundness conditions, the expense and difficulty of collecting measurements on living animals limit their application in the field. The previous studies on genetic parameters demonstrated that the heritability of FL structure traits was low to moderate ranging from 0.01–0.40 [11–15]. The genetic and phenotypic correlations among most of FL traits are adverse, and some of them have correlation with overall leg locomotion. The studies also indicated that FL unsoundness was unfavorably associated with leanness and some carcass traits [12, 16, 17].

Due to low to moderate heritability of FL soundness traits, it may be preferable to improve these traits using marker assisted selection (MAS). A limited number of prospective chromosomal regions related to bone strength, locomotion and osteochondrosis-related traits had been identified by previous quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies in the pig [7, 18]. However, very few candidate genes related to structural soundness and leg locomotion have been identified in the pig thus far. Most recently, whole genome association studies on human complex diseases have provided a great number of candidate genes pertaining to bone-related disorders [19–21]. This information makes it possible to conduct candidate gene discoveries in the pig based on the findings in humans.

The purpose of this study was to identify the candidate genes associated with body conformation, FL structure soundness and leg action in the pig, focusing a high throughput multiplex single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping technology. The findings will provide genetic factors for structural unsoundness, which can be utilized into MAS schemes to improve these traits in pigs. The study also contributes to the understanding of comparative genetic control on skeletal development between humans and pigs.

Methods

Animals and scoring traits

The present study was conducted on piglets (n = 2,066) entering into the commercial herds from breeding stock originating from the Newsham Choice Genetics company between October 2005 and July 2006. These animals belonged to two genetic lines; 1,000 animals were from a grandparent maternal line and the other 1,066 animals were from a parent maternal line. All of animals in these two lines were Large White × Landrace gilts but actually were derived from different sources and are now both synthetics. The evaluation of 17 traits was carried out as when each animal reached the body weight of ~90 kg. The traits consisted of six body conformation traits including body size (length, depth and width) and body shape (hip structure, rib shape and correctness of top line); five FL structure traits per leg pair, front legs (legs turned, buck knees, pastern posture, foot size and uneven toes) and rear legs (legs turned, weak/upright legs, pastern posture, foot size and uneven toes), and overall leg action. The scoring formats for traits were modified based on PIH 101 Feet and Leg Soundness in Swine (Guidelines for uniform swine improvement programs, distributed by National Swine Improvement Federation) and those described by van Steenbergen [13] and Serenius et al. [12]. Scoring trait criterion and the description of scores are shown in Table 1 and Additional file 1, respectively.

Table 1 The description of the 17 analyzed traits of body conformation, feet and leg structure and overall leg action.
Full size table

The traits were independently evaluated by two experienced scorers using a 9-point scale, where 1 and 9 indicated the extreme phenotypes of the traits. The intermediate score is the most favorable for four of the scoring traits including correctness of top line, turned front legs, turned rear legs and weak/upright rear legs, and the original scores for these four traits were adjusted by subtracting 5 from the score and taking the absolute value for each animal before performing statistical analyses.

Gene selection and SNP genotyping

Candidate genes were selected for SNP discovery. The genes are involved in skeletal pattern development, bone matrix biosynthesis, osteoclast and osteoblast differentiation, calcium and phosphorus metabolism and bone related signaling pathways. In total, 214 genes were initially chosen and among them 95 genes were successfully analyzed in the present study (Additional file 2).

Corresponding human gene sequences for exons, introns, 5'UTR and 3'UTR were retrieved from the Ensembl database http://www.ensembl.org/index.html, and they were blasted using the default parameters (0.01; low complexity; 100; 100; -G5-E2) against the pig genomic sequence database to obtain homologous pig sequences http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/genome/guide/pig/; http://www.animalgenome.org/blast/. Primers were designed through Primer 3.0 http://fokker.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi.

Ear tissue was collected from animals using the TypiFix™ ear tag from Agrobiogen (Hilgertshausen, Germany). The DNA was isolated from dry ear tissue using the DNeasy 96 Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). The PCR system consisted of 12.5 ng porcine genomic DNA, 1 × GoTaq PCR buffer, 0.125 mM of each dNTP, 0.25 mM of each primer and 0.25 U GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a 10 μl reaction volume. The PCR conditions were 94°C for 4 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, optimum annealing temperature (54–62°C) for 30 sec and 72°C for 30 sec, with a final extension for 5 min at 72°C using MJ-PTC 200 thermocycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA, USA). PCR products from the DNA of several animals with extreme phenotypes were pooled and sequenced (DNA Facility of Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA). Five multiplexed assays for 172 SNPs were designed by means of the MassARRAY Design software and were run through Sequenom's MassARRAY system (Sequenom Inc, San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical analyses

The normality testing and phenotypic correlations among traits were estimated using UNIVARIATE and CORR (Pearson) procedures of the SAS software package (SAS Institute, release 9.1, Cary, NC, USA), respectively. Genotype frequency, minor allele frequency (MAF) and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing were calculated with the computer program developed by our lab. Association analyses between SNPs and the traits were carried out using the MIXED procedure of the SAS package. The statistical model used in this study is as follows:

Y ijklmnop = μ + Animal i + Sire j + Gilt line k + Evaluation date l + Scorer m + Genotype n + b·(Body weight o ) + e ijklmnop

In this model, gilt line, evaluation date, scorer and marker genotype were fixed effects; sire and animal were random effects; body weight was a covariate and b is the regression coefficient. The animals with unknown sire information were considered to be derived from a different sire in order to ensure the validity of association analyses. The significance of fixed effects was determined using Type 3 tests. The raw P-values were adjusted using multiple testing, which was implemented with resampling-based false discovery rate (FDR) methods with the MULTTEST package of the R program [22], and a 20% threshold of FDR was applied to avoid false positives and consider significant SNPs. Haplotype analyses and graphical representation of linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure as measured by r2 were performed with the Haploview software (ver. 3.32) [23]. Haplotypes were obtained for each animal using the PHASE computer program (ver. 2.1) [24]. The association analyses between different copy numbers of specific haplotypes and traits were executed using the MIXED procedure of SAS as mentioned above.

In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted with the PRINCOMP procedure of the SAS package. The first component of PCA is the mathematical combination of measurements explaining the largest amount of variability in the data, and the association analyses between the SNPs and principal components (PC1 and PC2) in this study were performed using the MIXED model as described above.

Results

Phenotype statistics

The basic statistics and phenotypic correlations between the analyzed traits are listed in Table 1 and Additional file 3, respectively. Apart from the four traits with intermediate values, population average values of most traits were between 4.1 and 5.3. There was no highly significant phenotypic correlation between most of the analyzed traits. Body conformation traits showed small, generally non-significant correlations with overall leg action. PCA was performed on body conformation and FL structural traits separately because of the low phenotypic correlations between the traits (Additional file 4). For body conformation traits, the cumulative proportion of the first three principal components (PC1, PC2 and PC3) reached 72%. The PC1 was mainly comprised of body depth, body width and rib shape, which explained 34% of total variation and mainly described body volume in a biological sense. The PC2 consisted primarily of hip structure and top line traits, and described side profile and the PC3 focused on body length. However, for FL structural traits and overall leg action, PC1, PC2 and PC3 accounted for 42% of total variation. The PC1 mainly included overall leg action, front pastern posture, rear pastern posture and buck knee obtained around 20% of total variation and could be considered as an indicator for leg movement evaluation. The PC2 was mostly composed of foot size per pair, describing feet defects, and the PC3 was mainly comprised of uneven toes per pair, which reflects small inner toe problems.

Genotyping statistics

Among the 214 genes chosen in the study, 435 SNPs were detected in 146 genes and the SNPs were deposited to dbSNP of NCBI (Accession numbers: ss86352080-ss86352515). Excluding SNPs with no call, monomorphism, mistaken inheritance, MAF less than 5% and a call rate less than 85%, 119 SNPs from 95 genes were successfully genotyped by Sequenom's MassARRAY system. Detailed information including the analyzed genes, SNP types, locations and other statistics was summarized in Additional file 2.

Association analyses for single trait

Empirical P-values for association analyses between SNPs and a single trait, and labeled SNPs representing ones that were significantly associated with the trait (at level of 1% nominal P-value and under the 20% threshold of FDR) are illustrated in Additional file 5. A total of 106 trait-marker combinations were considered to be significant according to 20% FDR criterion. The significant SNPs are listed in Additional file 6.

A total of 69 SNPs from 54 genes had at least one significant association at the P < 0.05 level. For overall leg action, which reflects both FL structural soundness and freedom from other defects affecting the gait, 20 SNPs from 15 genes were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with this trait. APOE was very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated and MTHFR, GNRHR, CALCR, IHH and WNT16 were highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated. Multiple SNPs from CALCR and COL1A2 were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with overall leg action.

For body size traits (length, depth and width), COL9A1 was highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with all three traits and APOE, CART, INSL3 and DKFZ were suggestively (P < 0.1) associated with these traits. The body shape traits (top line, hip structure and rib shape) were involved in the development of long back vertebrae, ribs, hipbones and rump muscles. FBN1 and BMP8 were very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated with top line and COL1A2 and CALCR were very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated with hip structure.

All of the SNPs detected from BMPR1B, CALCR and COL1A2 were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with front pasterns, and both SNPs within OPG were highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with front uneven toes. All SNPs within COL1A2 and CALCR were highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with rear pasterns. In addition, it was found that ESR2, MC4R and PTHR1 were the common genes suggestively (P < 0.1) associated with front and rear legs turn in/out, and BMPR1B, CALCR, CASR, OXTR and PTHR1 were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with front and rear pasterns. In the same manner, ADAM12, ALXO5, ALOX15, COL9A2, MATN3, NOCT1, WNT7B and WNT16 were suggestively associated (P < 0.1) with front and rear foot size and COL1A2, MEPE, OPG, PAPPA and PPARG were suggestively (P < 0.1) associated with uneven toes of all legs.

Association analyses for principal components

Among principal components of body conformation, the genes COL9A1, DKFZ, PAPPA and VDBP were very highly significantly associated (P < 0.001) with the PC1. Similarly, CALCR, COL1A2, FBN1 and OXTR had very highly significant (P < 0.001) association with PC2. The PC1 of FL traits exhibited very highly significant (P < 0.001) associations with CALCR and OXTR. The genes ALOX5, COL9A2 and WNT16 were highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated with PC2 of FL traits.

From the results of association analyses for single trait and PCs, APOE, CALCR, COL1A2, COL9A1, DKFZ and VDBP were very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated candidate genes for body conformation traits. ALOX5, BMP8, CALCR, COL1A2, OPG, OXTR and WNT16 were very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated with FL structure soundness traits, and APOE, CALCR, COL1A2, GNRHR, IHH, MTHFR and WNT16 were highly significant (P < 0.01) genes associated with overall leg action in the pig.

Haplotype construction and association analyses of CALCR and COL1A2

All four SNPs within CALCR and the two SNPs within COL1A2 displayed a strong association with the analyzed traits, and these two genes are located adjacent to each other on SSC9, which prompted the haplotype analysis for tag SNP identification. Three major haplotypes, which accounted for 98% of alleles (Figure 1), were obtained and were shown as follows, haplotype 1, -ACGACC- (60.9%), haplotype 2, -CTCGTT- (22.3%) and haplotype 3, -CCGACC- (15%). The association results for each of these three haplotypes are shown in Additional file 7. There was a highly significant (P < 0.01) difference between individuals carrying haplotype 1 and those without haplotype 1 for traits such as overall leg action, rear pasterns, front pasterns and PC1 of FL structure. The counterpart of haplotype 1, haplotype 2, showed significant (P < 0.05) associations with the above traits. Haplotype 3 was not associated with overall leg action.

Figure 1
figure 1

Association analyses results of single marker and haplotype construction of SNPs within CALCR and COL1A2 in SSC9 (The x -axis indicates SNP ID and y -axis indicates -log (P-value). The dbSNP no. for COL1A2 _01, COL1A2 _02, CALCR _01, CALCR _02, CALCR _03 and CALCR _04 are ss86352086, ss86352087, ss86352109, ss86352112, ss86352113 and ss86352114, respectively. Black boxes indicate r2 values between 0.9 and 1.0, and light boxes indicate r2 values less than 0.80.)

Full size image

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first report on large-scale candidate gene associations with body conformation, FL soundness traits and overall leg action in the pig. The present findings provided a reliable and comprehensive list of candidate genes for further use in fine mapping and biological functional analyses.

Population structure is one of important components affecting association and linkage disequilibrium analyses. However, the significant interactions between markers and lines were only found for a very few markers in the study (data was not shown). In addition, the separate linkage disequilibrium pattern and haplotype frequencies were similar for these two lines, as well as the combination of both lines (data was not shown). Therefore, the interaction between marker and line were excluded and was not considered further in the study.

Comparative genomic approaches offer an efficient tool for candidate gene identification across closely related species. The accumulating candidate gene findings on human bone related disorders are contributing to studies in pigs. A large number of genes being considered as prospective genes for human bone related disorders were found to be associated with the analyzed traits in the pig. The genes involved in skeletal pattern development such as WNT2, WNT16, BMP8 and IHH were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with several important traits (Additional file 6). The Wnt/β-catenin pathway is critical during the development of bone and cartilage tissues. WNT gene family numbers such as WNT -3a, -5a, -6, -7a, -7b, -10b and -11 and Wnt associated proteins like frizzed related protein, LRP5 and β-catenin were proposed to function in bone formation [19, 25]. In this study, WNT -2, -7b, -10b and SFRP4 showed significant (P < 0.05) associations with one or several body conformation and FL traits. In addition, WNT16 was highly significantly (P < 0.05) associated with a few of the individual traits such as overall leg action, buck knee, leg turned in/out and the principal components describing feet defects. The Wnt receptor LRP5 was very highly (P < 0.001) significantly associated with front foot size. These observations suggest that Wnt signaling should be analyzed further for structural traits in pigs. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) interact with their specific receptors and function in the formation of bone and skeletal patterning. The genes BMP -2, -4, -5 and -7 have been considered as inducers during the bone development processing [19, 26]. Significant associations for BMP7 with these traits were not found in this study, but BMP8 was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with traits such as overall leg action and front leg pastern. This indicated that the biological functions of BMPs on bones may differ in pigs or exerted at different body locations. Conversely, the very highly significant (P < 0.001) association of BMPR1B with front pastern posture suggested that the roles it plays in the pig may be similar to humans, since the mutations in this gene were associated with brachydactyli type A2 [27].

Bone strength and geometry depend on bone matrix and bone mineral density (BMD). The genes implicating BMD variation and multiple epiphyseal dysplasias (MED) like COL1A1, COL1A2, CO9A1, COL9A2 and COL9A3 were highly suggestive in humans [19, 28]. In this study, COL1A2 exhibited a significant (P < 0.05) association with overall leg action and other important traits. COL9A1 was highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with body size traits and principal component denoting body volume. These two genes were associated with human hip osteoarthitis [29, 30]. COL2A1 was reported to be linked to nodal osteoarthritis [29] and it was highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with front leg pastern and front uneven toes. COL9A2 was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with top line and rear leg and feet soundness traits in the pig and it was related to degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis [31] and inter-vertebral disc disease [32] in humans. These results showed that further studies on these candidate genes, including additional SNP discovery and haplotype analyses, are worthwhile.

The genes affecting the functions of bone cells such as OPG, RANKL, CALCR and OXTR exhibited significant association with the analyzed traits in this study (Additional file 6). Both RANKL and OPG are important regulators of bone remodeling, and play essential roles during the osteoclastogenesis and activation of osteoclast [19, 33]. In this study, one of the two SNPs from OPG and RANKL was associated with certain traits while the other SNP for each gene showed association with different traits. This implied that the SNPs might be derived from different LD blocks or they have pleiotropic effects. CALCR encodes calcitonin receptor, a 7-transmembrane receptor located on the surface of osteoclasts. Calcitonin activates calcitonin receptor which stimulates adenylate cyclase and leads to the inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption. The polymorphisms of CALCR were related to human BMD and played a role during the pathogenesis of osteoporosis [34, 35]. Strong associations of multiple SNPs located in intron 9 and 3'UTR with overall leg action and several FL soundness traits suggested that CALCR had significant effects on pig structural soundness and locomotion. Oxytocin receptor mediates oxytocin action through G proteins and activates a phosphatidylinositol- calcium second messenger system. A synonymous mutation in exon 3 of OXTR was highly significantly (P < 0.01) associated with front and rear leg pasterns and two principal components demonstrating body side profile and leg movement. Hittmeier et al. [36] found increased OXTR mRNA expression in bone marrow cells in pigs fed with phosphorus (P) deficient diet, and speculated that OXTR might affect bone growth and turnover through controlling P utilization and PGE2 synthesis.

The genes related to fat metabolism such as APOE, CART, PPARG, ALOX5 and ALOX15 were significantly (P < 0.01) associated with body conformation and FL traits (Additional file 6). The connections between human osteoporosis and obesity are being explored in humans. It was also reported that animals with increased fatness usually have positive FL soundness and leg action [11, 17]. Apolipoprotein E is responsible for accumulating excess fat in adipose tissue [37] and adequate lipid content triggers the synthesis and secretion of leptin from adipose tissue into circulation. Leptin further acts on the hypothalamus and releases cocaine and amphetamine regulated transcript (CART) protein that inhibits bone resorption thus promoting bone strength [38, 39]. Whereas, PPARG negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells and positively promotes adipogenesis resulting in bone loss [40]. Our studies primarily gave clues that a leptin mediated neuroendocrine bone remodeling may play a key role for different levels of FL structure and body conformation traits in pigs.

Earlier QTL mapping studies on FL, leg action and osteochondrosis traits in pigs uncovered the most interesting regions and more than five QTLs were mapped on SSC1, 5, 7, 13 and 16 [7, 18]. From this study, a number of interesting genes were identified on the above chromosomal regions. For instance QTLs related to FL scores for front and rear legs were mapped between microsatellite CGA and S0082 and a QTL related to front legs from side-view was mapped around SW974 on SSC1, where both COL9A1 and ESR2 are located. On SSC13, eight QTLs related to FL and gait traits were discovered by different researchers. The genes PTHR1, PPARG, OXTR and CASR with significant association seen in this study were between S0068 and SW344 on SSC13 where most of the QTL were mapped. The study also revealed that several prospect genes were not located in the putative chromosomal regions. For instance, the very highly significantly (P < 0.001) associated genes such as CALCR and COL1A2 were on SSC9, where only two QTL were detected. Our findings offered more valuable information for candidate genes selection in addition to those revealed by QTL studies.

Strong and highly significant (r2 > 0.8) LD between CALCR and COL1A2 was detected. Xiong et al. [35] detected five LD blocks comprising of 27 SNPs in human CALCR gene, and found one SNP within 3'UTR was significantly associated with BMD and osteoporosis in the hip. It was suggested that 3'UTR of CALCR might be the most important region for SNP identification. The absence of haplotype 1 in pigs and the presence of its counterpart haplotype 2 favored overall leg action, but was not related to FL soundness traits such as front leg pasterns and rear leg pasterns. The contradictory results might result from the negative phenotypic correlation between overall leg action and these FL traits or the SNPs were located in different LD blocks. More SNPs within CALCR and COL1A2 are needed for further analysis.

Worth noting however, is we did not observe very highly significant (P < 0.001) association of VDR and LRP5 with body conformation, FL soundness traits and overall leg action, even though these two had been considered as important candidate genes for human bone disorders [19–21]. The reasons might be that a causative SNP has yet to be detected in the current study or they have different biological roles on the traits in the pig. In future work, an in depth-scan of SNPs and haplotype analyses are necessary for confirming the significant genes proposed by this study. Studies on interactions between genes and environments are also needed to better understand the genetic regulation mechanisms on skeleton development and the related disorders in pigs.

Conclusion

Feet and leg unsoundness issues have become a growing problem in the swine industry, but few candidate genes related to leg soundness traits have been identified to date. Results from our study provided a reliable and comprehensive list of candidate genes associated with body conformation, FL soundness traits and overall leg action in the pig. The genes ALOX5, BMP8, CALCR, OPG, OXTR and WNT16 were very highly significantly associated with FL structures, and APOE, CALCR, COL1A2, GNRHR, IHH, MTHFR and WNT16 were highly significantly associated with overall leg action. Two genes CALCR and COL1A2 on SSC9 were in strong linkage disequilibrium, and one haplotype -ACGACC- was highly significantly associated with overall leg action and several important FL soundness traits. These findings motivate future studies in fine mapping and biological functional analyses to verify the effects of these genes.

Abbreviations

BMD:

bone mineral density

FDR:

false discovery rate

FL:

feet and leg

LD:

linkage disequilibrium

MAF:

minor allele frequency

MAS:

marker assisted selection

PCA:

principal component analysis

QTL:

quantitative trait loci

SNP:

single nucleotide polymorphism

UTR:

un-translated region

References

  1. Johnson DR: The genetics of the skeleton. 1986, New York: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marks SC, Odgren PR: Structure and development of the skeleton. Principles of Bone Biology. Edited by: Bilezikian JP, Raisz L, Rodan GA. 2002, San Diego: Academic Press, 3-15. 2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirk RK, Svensmark B, Ellegarrd LP, Jensen HE: Locomotive disorders associated with sow mortality in Danish pig herds. J Vet Med A. 2005, 52: 423-428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nakano T, Brennan JJ, Aherne FX: Leg weakness and osteochondrosis in swine: a review. Can J Anim Sci. 1987, 67: 883-901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stern S, Lundeheim N, Johansson K, Andersson K: Osteochondrosis and leg weakness in pigs selected for lean tissue growth rate. Livestock Prod Sci. 1995, 44: 45-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stalder KJ, Knauer M, Baas TJ, Rothschild MF, Mabry JW: Sow longevity. Pig News and Information. 2004, 25: 53N-74N.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andersson-Eklund L, Uhlhorn H, Lundehim N, Dalin G, Andersson L: Mapping quantitative trait loci for principal components of bone measurements and osteochondrosis scores in a wild boar × Large White intercross. Genet Res Camb. 2000, 75: 223-230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirk RK, Jørgensen B, Jensen HE: The impact of elbow and knee joint lesions on abnormal gait and posture of sows. Acta Vet Scand. 2008, 50: 5

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ytrehus B, Grindflek E, Teige J, Stubsjøen E, Grøndalen T, Carlson CS, Ekman S: The effect of parentage on the prevalence, severity and location of lesions. J Vet Med A. 2004, 51: 188-195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jørgensen B, Vestergaard T: Genetics of leg weakness in boars at the Danish pig breeding stations. Acta Agric Scand. 1990, 40: 59-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nikkilä M, Stalder K, Mote B, Lamper J, Thorn B, Rothschild M, Johnson A, Karrier K, Serenius T: Heritability estimates for structural soundness traits in commercial pig. Forty-first Midwestern Sectional Scientific Sessions and Business Meeting: 17–19 March 2008; Des Moines. 2008, s29

    Google Scholar 

  12. Serenius T, Sevón-Aimonen ML, Mäntysaari EA: The genetics of leg weakness in Finish Large White and Landrace populations. Livestock Prod Sci. 2001, 69: 101-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Steenbergen EJ: Description and evaluation of a linear scoring system for exterior traits in pigs. Livestock Prod Sci. 1989, 23: 163-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berekin B: Genetic aspects of feet and leg soundness in swine. J Anim Sci. 1979, 48: 1322-1328.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rothschild MF, Christian LL: Genetic control of front leg weakness in Duroc swine I. Direct response to five generations of divergent selection. Livestock Prod Sci. 1988, 19: 459-471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kadarmideen HN, Schwörer D, Ilahi H, Malek M, Hofer A: Genetics of osteochondral disease and its relationship with meat quality and quantity, growth, and feed conversion traits in pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004, 82: 3118-3127.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothschild MF, Christian LL, Jung YC: Genetic control of front leg weakness in Duroc swine II. Correlated response in growth rate, backfat and reproduction from five generations in divergent selection. Livestock Prod Sci. 1988, 19: 473-485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee GJ, Archibald AL, Garth GB, Law AS, Nicholson D, Barr A, Haley CS: Detection of quantitative trait loci for locomotion and osteochondrosis-related traits in Large White × Meishan pigs. Anim Sci. 2003, 76: 155-165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen MM: The new bone biology: pathologic, molecular, and clinical correlates. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2006, 140A: 2646-2706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu YJ, Shen H, Xiao P, Xiong DH, Li LH, Recker RR, Deng HW: Molecular genetic studies of gene identification for osteoporosis: A 2004 update. J Bone Miner Res. 2006, 21: 1511-1535.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ralston SH, de Crombrugghe B: Genetic regulation of bone mass and susceptibility to osteoporosis. Gene Devel. 2006, 20: 2492-2506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. MULTTEST package. [http://rh-mirrorlinuxiastateedu/CRAN/]

  23. Barrett JE, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 263-265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stephens M, Smith N, Donnelly P: A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001, 69: 978-989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yates KE, Shortkroff S, Reish RG: Wnt influence on chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage function. DNA Cell Biol. 2005, 24: 446-457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosen V, Wonzney JM: Bone morphogenetic proteins. Principles of Bone Biology. Edited by: Bilezikian JP, Raisz L, Rodan GA. 2002, San Diego: Academic Press, 919-928. 2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Lehmann K, Seemann P, Stricker S, Sammar M, Meyer B, Suring K, Majewski F, Tinschert S, Grzeschik KH, Muller D, Knaus P, Nurnberg P, Mundlos S: Mutations in bone morphogenetic protein receptor 1B cause brachydactyly type A2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 12277-12282.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rossert J, de Crombrugghe B: Type I collagen: structure, synthesis and regulation. Principles of Bone Biology. Edited by: Bilezikian JP, Raisz L, Rodan GA. 2002, San Diego: Academic Press, 189-210. 2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Mustafa Z, Chapman K, Irven C, Carr AJ, Clipsham K, Chitnavis J, Sinsheimer JS, Bloomfield VA, McCartney M, Cox O, Sykes B, Loughlin J: Linkage analysis of candidate genes as susceptibility loci for osteoarthritis-suggestive linkage of COL9A1 to female hip osteoarthritis. Rheumatol. 2000, 39: 299-306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Snelgrove TA, Peddle LJ, Stone C, Noftall F: Association of COL1A2, COL2A1 and COL9A1 and primary osteoarthritis in a founder population. Clin Genet. 2005, 67: 359-360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Noponen-Hietala N, Kyllönen E, Männikkö M, Ilkko E, Karppinen J, Ott J, Ala-Kokko L: Sequence variations in the collagen IX and XI genes are associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003, 62: 1208-1214.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Annunen S, Paassilta P, Lohiniva J, Perälä M, Pihlajamaa T, Karppinen J, Tervonen O, Kröger H, Lähde S, Vanharanta H, Ryhänen L, Göring HHH, Ott J, Prockop DJ, Ala-Kokko L: An allele of COL9A2 associated with intervertebral disc disease. Science. 1999, 285: 409-412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schoppet M, Preissner KT, Hofbauer LC: RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin: Paracrine regulation of bone metabolism and vascular function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002, 22: 549-553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Braga V, Sangalli A, Malerba G, Mottes M, Mirandola S, Gatti D, Rossini M, Zamboni M, Adami S: Relationship among VDR, COLIA1, and CTR polymorphisms with bone mass, bone turnover markers, and sex hormones in men. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002, 70: 457-462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiong DH, Shen H, Zhao LJ, Xiao P, Yang TL, Guo Y, Wang W, Guo YF, Liu YJ, Recker RR, Deng HW: Robust and comprehensive analysis of 20 osteoporosis candidate genes by very high-density single nucleotide polymorphism screen among 405 white nuclear families identified significant association and gene-gene interaction. J Bone Miner Res. 2006, 21: 1678-1695.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hittmeier LJ, Grapes L, Lensing RL, Rothschild MF, Stahl CH: Genetic background influences metabolic response to dietary phosphorus restriction. J Nut Biochem. 2006, 17: 385-395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gao J, Katagiri H, Ishigaki Y, Yamada T, Ogihara T, Imai J, Uno K, Hasegawa Y, Kanzaki M, Yamamoto TT, Ishibashi S, Oka Y: Involvement of apolipoprotein E in excess fat accumulation and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007, 56: 24-33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Singh MK, Elefteriou F, Karsenty G: Cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript may regulate bone remodeling as a circulating molecule. Endocrinol. 2008, 149: 3933-3941.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Elefteriou F, Ahn JD, Takeda S, Starbuck M, Yang X, Liu X, Kondo H, Richards WG, Bannon TW, Noda M, Clement K, Vaisse C, Karsenty G: Leptin regulation of bone resorption by the sympathetic nervous system and CART. Nature. 2005, 434: 514-520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marie PJ, Kaabeche K: PPAR gamma activity and control of bone mass in skeletal unloading. PPAR Res. 2006, 2006: 64807

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of Dr. Rothschild's laboratory for their assistance on this project. Also the authors appreciate the help of Drs. Jack Dekkers, Rohan Fernando and Dan Nettleton for their valuable suggestions on data analyses. This work was funded in part by the National Pork Board, Newsham Choice Genetics, State of Iowa and Hatch funding, and the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Science and Center for Integrated Animal Genomics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA

    Bin Fan, Suneel K Onteru, Benny E Mote, Timo Serenius, Kenneth J Stalder & Max F Rothschild

  2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Education & College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, PR China

    Bin Fan

Authors
  1. Bin Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suneel K Onteru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benny E Mote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Timo Serenius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kenneth J Stalder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Max F Rothschild
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Max F Rothschild.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

BF carried out the SNP discovery, genotyping and data analysis, and drafted the manuscript. SKO participated in the SNP discovery, genotyping and data analysis and manuscript preparation. BEM, TS and KJS carried out the traits scoring on field and data collection. MFR conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional File 1: Appendix One. The criteria for the scoring of the analyzed traits in the study. (PPT 174 KB)

12711_2008_2389_MOESM2_ESM.doc

Additional File 2: Table Two. The characteristics of the analyzed SNPs (SNPs were sorted by their chromosomal locations). (DOC 196 KB)

12711_2008_2389_MOESM3_ESM.doc

Additional File 3: Appendix Two. The phenotypic correlations between the 17 analyzed traits of body conformation, feet and leg structure and overall leg action. (DOC 52 KB)

12711_2008_2389_MOESM4_ESM.doc

Additional File 4: Appendix Three. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of principal component (PC) analysis on the 17 analyzed traits. (DOC 32 KB)

12711_2008_2389_MOESM5_ESM.ppt

Additional File 5: Appendix Four. Association analyses results of single SNP markers with body conformation, feet and leg structure traits and principal factors in two commercially available breeding female lines (The x-axis indicates individual SNPs distributed along with pig chromosomes and y-axis indicates -log (P-value). SNPs with P < 0.001 and being under the 20% threshold of FDR are labeled. a) overall leg action; b) body depth; c) body length; d) body width; e) hip structure; f) rib shape; g) top line; h) front leg buck knee; i) front foot size; j) front pastern posture; k) front leg turned in/out; l) front uneven toes; m) rear foot size; n) rear pastern posture; o) rear leg turned in/out; p) rear uneven toes; q) rear weak leg; r) PC1 of body conformation traits; s) PC2 of body conformation traits; t) PC1 of feet and leg structure; u) PC2 of feet and leg structure). (PPT 432 KB)

12711_2008_2389_MOESM6_ESM.doc

Additional File 6: Table Three. The list of significant SNPs for the 17 analyzed traits of body conformation, feet and leg structure and overall leg action. (DOC 35 KB)

12711_2008_2389_MOESM7_ESM.doc

Additional File 7: Table Four. The association analyses between putative haplotypes of CALCR and COL1A2 in SSC9, and the individual traits as well as principal components. (DOC 33 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, B., Onteru, S.K., Mote, B.E. et al. Large-scale association study for structural soundness and leg locomotion traits in the pig. Genet Sel Evol 41, 14 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-14

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-14

Keywords

Genetics Selection Evolution

ISSN: 1297-9686