Table 2 |
||||||
|
Physical and genetic positions of published loci for resistance to Salmonella in fowl. |
||||||
|
Chr1 |
Locus type2 |
Locus name |
Trait3 |
Position4cM |
Mb |
Ref |
|
|
||||||
|
1 |
MSAT |
ADL0160 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
33 |
5.93 |
[15] |
|
|
||||||
|
QTL |
- |
CSWB counts (SE) |
85 |
33.57 |
[14] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
QTL |
- |
CSWB counts (ST) |
207 |
68.52 |
[14] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
MSAT |
ADL0020 |
ABR to SE vaccine Splenic and caecal loads (SE) |
286 |
94.16 |
[12] [78] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
CD28 |
Caecal load; ABR to SE vaccine |
- |
113.90 |
[62] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
MSAT |
ADL0198 |
ABR to SE vaccine Splenic and caecal load (SE) |
458 |
171.74 |
[12] [78] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
IAP1 |
caecal load (SE) Splenic load (SE) |
- |
186.92 |
[11] [55] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
2 |
QTL |
- |
CSWB counts (SE) |
87 |
26.93 |
[14] |
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
MD-2 |
Splenic load (SE) |
- |
122.83 |
[62] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
MSAT |
MCW0051 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
358 |
129.15 |
[15] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
3 |
MSAT |
MCW0083 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
51 |
13.99 |
[15] |
|
|
||||||
|
MSAT |
MCW0024 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
237 |
- |
[15] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
TGF-β4 |
Caecal load (SE) |
- |
18.29 |
[11] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
TGF-β2 |
Caecal load (SE) ABR to SE |
- |
20.54 |
[11] [66] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
Gal13 |
Caecal load (SE) |
- |
110.20 |
[60] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
Gal12 |
Caecal load (SE) |
- |
110.21 |
[60] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
Gal11 |
Caecal load (SE) |
- |
110.21 |
[60] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
Gal7 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
- |
110.25 |
[64] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
Gal3 |
ABR to SE vaccine Caecal load (SE) |
- |
110.26 |
[60] [64] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
Gal5 |
Spleen load (SE) |
- |
110.27 |
[60] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
4 |
CG |
TRAIL |
Spleen and caecal load (SE) |
- |
9.67 |
[63] |
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
IL-2 |
Caecal load (SE) |
- |
55.26 |
[11] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
5 |
QTL |
- |
CSWB counts (ST) |
100 |
36.10 |
[14] |
|
|
||||||
|
QTL |
- |
CSWB counts (SE) |
111 |
39.28 |
[14] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
QTL QTL |
SAL1 SAL1 |
Splenic load (ST) Splenic load (ST) |
157 - |
53.24 54.00-54.80 |
[13] [74] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
MSAT |
ADL0298 |
ABR to SE vaccine Splenic and caecal load (SE) |
198 |
60.23 |
[12] [78] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
TGF-β3 |
Caecal load (SE) |
- |
40.87 |
[63] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
6 |
MSAT |
ADL0138 |
ABR to SE vaccine Splenic and caecal load (SE) |
56 |
10.09 |
[12] [78] |
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
PSAP |
Splenic and caecal loads (SE) |
- |
13.02 |
[11] [55] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
7 |
CG |
SLC11A1 |
Survival rate (ST) Splenic and liver loads (SE) Splenic load (SE) Splenic load (SE); number of contaminated organs Splenic load (SE); ABR to SE vaccine Caecal load (SE) |
80 |
23.91 |
[10] [7] [55] [9] [61] [79] |
|
|
||||||
|
8 |
MSAT |
ADL301 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
80 EL |
25.10 |
[15] |
|
|
||||||
|
11 |
QTL |
- |
Caecal load (SE); CSWB counts |
18 |
3.66 |
[14] |
|
|
||||||
|
15 |
CG |
IGL |
Caecal load ABR to SE vaccine |
- |
8.17 |
[11] [63] |
|
|
||||||
|
16 |
QTL |
- |
Caecal load |
2 |
0.10 |
[14] |
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
MHC1 |
Splenic load (SE) |
- |
- |
[55] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
MHC class I α1 domain |
ABR to SE vaccine |
- |
0.04 |
[80] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
MHC class I α2 domain |
ABR to SE vaccine |
0.04 |
[80] |
||
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
MHC class I β1 domain |
ABR to SE vaccine |
0.06 |
[80] |
||
|
|
||||||
|
17 |
CG |
TLR4 |
Survival rate (ST) Survival rate (ST) Number of contaminated organs |
- |
4.06 |
[10] [54] [9] |
|
|
||||||
|
MSAT |
ADL0293 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
26 |
6.39 |
[15] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
19 |
CG |
CASP1 |
Caecal load |
- |
0.64 |
[11] |
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
iNOS |
Caecal load |
- |
9.17 |
[11] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
26 |
CG |
PIGR |
Splenic and caecal loads |
- |
0.00 |
[59] |
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
MAPKAPK12 |
Splenic and caecal loads |
- |
2.35 |
[59] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
CG |
IL10 |
Splenic and caecal loads |
- |
2.37 |
[59] |
|
|
|
||||||
|
28 |
MSAT |
LEI0135 |
ABR to SE vaccine |
0 |
0.18 |
[15] |
|
|
||||||
|
1Chromosome 2CG: candidate gene; MSAT: microsatellite 3ABR: antibody response; CSWB: cloacal swabs; ST: S. Typhimurium; SE: S. Enteritidis 4Physical positions were obtained by searching the Ensembl Genome Browser http://www.ensembl.org/index.html webcite with the original Accession Number given by the authors. QTL positions were calculated according to physical positions of flanking molecular marker. |
||||||
|
Calenge et al. Genetics Selection Evolution 2010 42:11 doi:10.1186/1297-9686-42-11 |
||||||